Posts by Julia Ehrenfeld

Journalists Using TwitterI’m what you would classify as a Twitter observer – I look but I don’t touch. In response to my inactivity, I’m frequently told by digital experts “use it or lose it,” but I like my omnipresent view of the Twittersphere. It comes in handy to quickly ascertain the score of a game or the cause of train delays.

In the vein of self improvement, I’ve been asking myself what more could I do on Twitter? One obvious answer is engaging with journalists. Which lead me to my next questions – how do journalists use Twitter?

With the help of my colleague Cary Ruterman, I conducted an unscientific, but telling, audit of reporters’ social media habits. We spoke with journalists from print, online, broadcast and wire outlets and all of them focused on finance (that is kind of what we are known for here at Prosek).

Here is what we asked and found...

How do you use Twitter (professionally, for your reporting)?
All our respondents utilize it in almost in the same way: to monitor news, to connect with sources and to see what the industry and competitors alike are "talking about."

That seems like a lot to rely on Twitter for. How does it really impact you reporting?
Almost all reporters audited consider Twitter to be a key, daily source for reporting with one describing Twitter an “essential resource.” One reluctant reporter admitted that “it is becoming more useful to a degree.”

Continue Reading »

Share:
  • email
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
Written on May 8th, 2013 by
Categories: Public Relations, Social Media | No Comments »

Unwritten Rules: What You Don't Know Can Hurt Your CareerDon’t wear flip flops. That was one of many rules outlined in the employee handbook we received when we first started at Prosek. We also aren’t allowed to harass or threaten our co-workers or come to work smelling bad as “good personal hygiene is expected.” Those are all easy enough rules to follow.

But remembering to apply deodorant and hiding your flip flops is hardly going to put your career on the fast track. As we learned earlier this week, there are other rules, “unwritten rules,” which are the key to career success.

We attended the British American Business’ Women's Forum hosted by KPMG and based on research conducted by Catalyst. The event consisted of a panel discussion on the unwritten rules for career advancement. The panel was made up of a group of successful women: Sarah Diamond, General Manager of Global Consulting Services at IBM; Kelly Watson, Managing Partner at KPMG; Laura Sabattini PhD, Senior Director of Research at Catalyst; and Amanda Drury, Anchor on CNBC.

According to Catalyst the term “unwritten rules” is generally used to describe unspoken workplace norms and behaviors that are necessary to success within an organization, but that are not communicated as consistently or explicitly as formalized work competencies are. Often, these behaviors are viewed as “what successful employees should do.”

Some of the rules are classic to business advancement 101, such as do good work, find the right mentor and build a professional network. Others were equally as important but less popular to admit, such as playing office politics, working long hours and never leaving the office before your boss.

Continue Reading »

Share:
  • email
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
Written on October 3rd, 2012 by and
Categories: Business, Industry Tips, Miscellaneous Musings | 3 Comments »

Advertising doesn’t cure diseases or feed hungry people, but society is better off with advertising than without. This is the mantra taught to most students enrolled in “AD101.” The number one benefit of advertising is that it subsidizes the cost of news and entertainment. Why is my Metro paper free every morning? Why do I only pay $50 dollars for 200 cable channels but HBO alone costs $20 a month? Advertising!

The floundering newspaper industry has been a topic of conversation for so long it is practically white noise. However, recently released data sheds light on just how dire the situation is from a historical perspective. According to research by the Newspaper Association of America, newspaper advertising revenue today (adjusted for inflation) is on par with how much newspapers were raking in during the 1950s. Even the Mad Men of the 1960s sold more newspaper ads than we do today.

Although there are fewer newspapers today than there were in the 1950s, so in theory each newspaper is getting a larger share of the pie. In the ’50s there were 1,772 daily newspapers and only 1,480 in the year 2000. That figure has dropped further in the last decade.

Today there are considerably more platforms for newspapers to place advertising: online, mobile, tablets. And as my buddy Sean Silva recently wrote, publications such as USA Today are overhauling their designs and layout to create continuity between their growing digital platforms. It is safe to predict in the future more investments from traditional media that leverage digital counterparts to increase and supplement new revenue streams.

In fact, this week the Atlantic’s digital-only sister publication Quartz (qz.com) went live. As The New York Time reported this weekend, the new website geared towards global business executives was born in part out of Atlantic Media owner David Bradley’s inability to economically turn The Atlantic into a glossy weekly publication. “It’s become very, very clear to me that digital trumps print, and that pure digital, without any legacy costs, massively trumps print,” Mr. Bradley told the NYT.

Where else are you seeing digital media overtake print? End of Story

Share:
  • email
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
Written on September 26th, 2012 by
Categories: Advertising, Journalism | 1 Comment »

I’ll admit it. The “errand” I just ran was only an excuse to go outside and de-thaw in the sun for five minutes. Following an hour and a half long call in a conference room that competes with Syracuse (Go Orange!) for record lows, sitting at my desk covered in two jackets wasn’t going to cut it.

Really, what’s five minutes? According to research by Cornell University just featured in Fast Company, my sun bathing trip might actually cost me a lot. The study found employees in an ideal temperature setting saves companies an average of two dollars per hour, per employee. More specifically, when temperatures are low (68 degrees), employees make 44 percent more errors and are half as productive as when temperatures are warmer (77 degrees). Seventy-seven degrees sounds a little toasty, other studies show 71 to 72 degrees will do the trick.

It makes sense. The more energy you have to expend feeling warm and comfortable, the less energy you have to devote elsewhere. In short, if you want productive and inspired employees turn down the AC and invest in this fashionable accessory or better yet these.

What are other factors that increase your productivity at work?

Although, I would argue here at Prosek we work under the most trying of conditions from typing emails while on a treadmill to taking calls in airport security lines. Share your extreme workplace conditions and what helps you stay productive. End of Story

Share:
  • email
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
Written on September 21st, 2012 by
Categories: Industry Tips, Miscellaneous Musings | No Comments »

What do the companies that cool your apartment in 90 degree weather, ensure you don’t miss an episode of HBO’s Girls, transport you to your Caribbean vacation and connect you to your friends online all have in common? We hate them.

According to latest American Customer Satisfaction Index, the list of the 15 most disliked companies in the country (see full list below) is dominated by utility companies, cable provides, airlines, insurance companies, Bank of America and. . .  FACEBOOK?

Let us examine the list further and determine the root of the issues. Most utility companies and cable providers operate as regional monopolies. This structure often breeds limited choices, higher prices and lower customer service. No one likes those things.

The other common thread between these companies is that many have served as the poster children for the country’s financial ills. Between the airlines’ bankruptcies (and subsequent acquisitions and luggage fees), Bank of America’s ill-fated decisions, and Facebook’s botched IPO, these companies have been the subject of many Wall Street Journal headlines.

Continue Reading »

Share:
  • email
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
Written on July 5th, 2012 by
Categories: From the News | 2 Comments »