Posts Tagged ‘Communication’

What can we in the media world learn from apes, elephants and several other animals? Besides the occasional eye-opening Discovery Channel documentary and some great cartoons, there’s more to uncover here than you might think.

Emory University’s Dr. Frans de Lost in TranslationWaal published an interesting study in The Wall Street Journal over the weekend detailing the flaws in how we as humans approach the study of animal intelligence. Using several examples, de Waal illustrates that our previous perception of animals being purely primitive and instinctive in their IQ level is actually a competence flaw among us as humans. Here are two quick examples of what these tests on animals reveal about humans:

The Elephant Test: Originally scientists tried to entice an elephant to use its trunk to reach for a stick that would help bring an out-of-reach piece of food closer, not realizing that picking up the stick with its trunk would block its nasal passages, thereby making it unaware of the food. They mistakenly concluded the elephant was not intelligent enough to perform the exercise.

The Chimp Test:  Scientists put chimps through facial recognition exercises using only human faces and, when the chimp delivered an average performance, they mistakenly concluded that chimps were not smart enough to perform facial recognition. After discovering their blunder, they replaced the human faces with those of other chimps, and the test results skyrocketed.

So What?

De Waal’s study reveals that as humans, we often assume that animals think and communicate the same way that we do. I believe that this problem also applies to how we communicate with other humans. We often assume that other people “speak our language” when in reality, we all have very different ways of communicating.

Read the rest of this entry »

Share:
  • email
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERAIt isn’t everyday that you get a chance to connect with and learn from a living legend. But that’s exactly what we at Unboxed Thoughts recently had a chance to do when we caught up with Carmen Baez, President – Latin America at Diversified Agency Services (DAS), the largest division of the Omnicom Group, one of the world’s leading marketing communications and advertising companies.  A few of the topics we discussed with Ms. Baez included her views on the growth segments of our industry, her advice for young, communications professionals, and the convergence of brand and reputation.

But first a bit about Ms. Baez's careeer. With more than three decades of marketing communication experience, Ms. Baez has been responsible for the development and growth of DAS agencies in Mexico as well as Central and South America, including global and leading marketing, advertising and public relations firms.

But her career started when she joined Omnicom at its inception in 1986. Since that time she has held various executive positions at global agencies where she counseled clients in a wide range of industries including high tech, financial services, telecomm, travel and entertainment.

In 1993, after a two-year sabbatical to travel the world, she co-founded Baez Zahorsky, Inc. (BZI), a Boston-based marketing communications consultancy that specialized in strategy planning and program development. BZI clients included Bank of Boston, Omnicom Group and The Walt Disney Company, among others. In 1997, she rejoined Omnicom to lead the DAS expansion in Latin America.

Among many other recognitions received, Carmen was named in 2010 an industry legend by the Association of National Advertiser’s ADCOLOR Industry Coalition, which promotes increased diversity in the advertising, marketing and media industries and celebrates the accomplishments of diverse role models and industry leaders.

Here is our interview with Ms. Carmen Baez… (click the jump or here to read the full interview)

Read the rest of this entry »

Share:
  • email
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

Jordyn Wieber at the Summer Olympics 2012

We’ve all seen the many shots of Jordyn Wieber bursting into tears when she heard that teammates Gabrielle Douglas and Aly Raisman would be moving on to the all-around gymnastics finals at the 2012 London Olympics without her. A New York Times editorial by Frank Bruni likened the media sensationalism to “the Real Housewives of the Uneven Parallel Bars” and called the coverage “melodramatic, voyeuristic and borderline sadistic.” I think Mr. Bruni is being a bit melodramatic himself, but he does have a point. Representing America is a lot of pressure to put on teenagers, especially when they've been gearing up for those few minutes of qualification time virtually their entire lives.

A heartbreaking loss is something that all athletes deal with at some point, but that doesn’t mean the gracious loser communications playbook comes easily. Wasn’t that how any 17-year old whose dreams have just been crushed would react? I’ve seen teenagers react more emotionally to getting a B- on a science test. And they didn’t immediately have to deal with the press pit that Jordyn did.

And even when Jordyn pushed past the media, trying to pull herself together, they caught up with her pressing for an interview. I was so impressed by how she pulled herself together and hit all the right talking points, despite her clear emotional distress. It takes a real presence of mind to remember to be appreciative of the opportunity, happy for teammates, and excited for what comes next, all while fighting back tears.

Jordyn’s statement to NBC was: "It's a little bit of a disappointment. It's always been a dream of mine to compete in the all-around at the Olympics and shoot for that gold medal. I'm really proud of Aly and Gabby both and I'm happy that they both made it to the all-around and I'm glad that I'll be able to help the team out in team finals."

While these messages may have been slipped to her in advance by a team of communications professionals, we all know how critical delivery is. She hit all the right points and didn’t stray out of bounds. She should get a PR medal for handling this devastating situation so well. And who knows, maybe those tears - not to mention the gold medal performance she turned in yesterday in the team finals - will turn into endorsements down the road. America loves a good story. End of Story

Share:
  • email
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

With media consumption patterns’ rapidly changing, it is becoming ever more apparent that social media is a pivotal aspect of today’s media landscape. While this fact may not be new to us in the PR world, many outlets and blogs have recently taken notice of social media’s global impact. Here’s a roundup of the latest from around the web…

  • The Holmes Report argues that the number of social media “followers” one has is a meaningless metric.
  • Mashable’s Samantha Murphy (Twitter) spotlights why Facebook’s new facial-recognition software raises privacy concerns.
  • PR News looks at Facebook’s desire to cash in on its new payment options.
  • AdAge’s Bradley Johnson (Twitter) ponders how Google became a $2 billion advertising behemoth.
  • Business Insider’s Owen Thomas (Twitter) looks at Facebook’s newest potential employee, 17 year old Nive Jayasekar.
  • AdAge’s Jack Neff (Twitter) opens up about how Unilever utilized Facebook to provide safe drinking water to 500 million people around the world.
  • The Daily Dog examines how Pinterest morphed into a Marketing Powerhouse.
  • Prakkypedia discusses seven great ways for journalists to use social media.
  • PR Daily explores 20 hot button topics for PR people to tweet about.
  • Stuart Bruce (Twitter) shares an interesting infographic that spotlights the recent surge of Facebook use in the Middle East and also looks at social network use around the world.
  • Brian Solis (Twitter) weighs in on the new Facebook Action Links and discusses how they will change social media as we know it!

Author’s Note: The Roundup is a new column that will spotlight the voices and opinions of PR professionals, marketers, branding experts and others across cyberspace. Our goal is to continue to provide you, our Unboxed Thoughts readers, with insights and reactions to today’s biggest stories for communicators. But more importantly, we want to hear your thoughts and reactions to these stories. No matter what your viewpoint, whether you find these stories interesting and accurate or shocking and off base, we want to know. Sound-off in the comments or email us directly. Why? Because there is always another side.

Have an article or topic you think should be included in the next Roundup? Email it to UnboxedThoughts@cjpcom.com. CJP

Michael Bogardus is an intern at CJP Communications

Share:
  • email
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

I could not help but feel a sense of sympathy for Walmart’s communications team (IR, corporate comms, PR, internal comms) when reading this past Sunday’s front-cover New York Times story about the company’s bribery scandal (my colleague Jen highlighted the communication implications on Unboxed Thoughts yesterday). While I possess no inside knowledge beyond what the story outlined, I was repeatedly struck by what indicated to me an incident where top-level company officials thought they knew best and proceeded without counsel from a broader circle of advisors. As a communications practitioner, we have all been there. Company officials will often focus on only the legal consequences and not the impact on other constituents. The mindset is that legal trumps all, except when it’s only one facet of an issue like this one. In today’s world, communication is not a “siloed” discipline. Corporate governance is not the sole purview of legal. This responsibility now also falls to IR. But financial impact is no longer limited to IR and now trickles down to PR. My point is that communications is a chain; it’s all interwoven and as the old adage goes, you are only as strong as your weakest link. If you keep one constituency in the dark, you can bet that’s where the trouble will arise.

Read the rest of this entry »

Share:
  • email
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon