Posts Tagged ‘Kristina Baldridge’

Sorority Consultants

Smu.edu

Ninety-nine percent of the articles we read point to a global economic meltdown with the US not coming off much better. Unemployment is nerve-wrackingly high, the gap between the haves and have nots continues to widen (especially if you’re an unmarried mom) and yet moms and their daughters are spending thousands of dollars on a weekend to learn how to get into the best sorority.

Wait, what?

The New York Times published an article yesterday that discussed a growing niche business that helps young women interested in joining college sororities prepare (i.e. choose the right outfits, learn the art of schmoozing and identify the best references) for the rush process.

As someone who was not part of the Greek scene during college (The University of North Carolina, to be exact), I won’t pretend to know the ins and outs of the process, but I cannot remember a single conversation with Greek life-focused friends that started with “my sorority consultant said…” Yes, I remember the scramble to find the right summer dress, but don’t remember thinking it would be worth paying $8,000 for someone to help me choose one. And I’m sure my parents wouldn’t have thought so either.

So I’m left to wonder – what’s going on here? College costs are at an all-time high (and increasing 8% a year), so how can anyone rationalize paying crazy fees for something like this? Can today’s college freshman not handle the growing pains associated with trying out for a club or sorority on their own? And what does that teach them as they enter the (this makes me feel old) “Grown Up World?” Or, maybe I’m making too much out this. You tell me. End of Story

Share:
  • email
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

Are quote reviews making our politicians sound (even more) boring? Regardless of who you’re voting for in 2012, it’s pretty clear that we’re not getting much information from either side of the aisle that isn’t flat or clearly watered down. This weekend The New York Times pulled the curtains back on an issue that we PR people (and our clients) deal with on a daily basis. It’s something that takes the color out of the articles we read about the upcoming election. It is, quote checking and review.

To those unfamiliar with the process, this is the act of dangling a juicy bit (or actually, in many cases, a not so juicy bit) of information in front of a reporter and then allowing them to write about it only after they’ve agreed to let us “tweak” the language they pull from the ensuing interview. In theory, changes are only made to quotes or sentences that are factually incorrect, but you can imagine that there are cases when whole paragraphs end up rewritten by communications teams or the source themselves. You can also imagine that the reporter on the other end of the line or email chain is not thrilled. But it happens and it’s also part of the reason why public relations professionals exist. We can help mediate between our clients and the media to ensure that if and when these changes are made, they’re as fair as possible and both parties are content.

Read the rest of this entry »

Share:
  • email
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Tumblr
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon